Among competitors of the E 220 BlueTEC end up being 2014 BMW 535d and 2014 Audi A6 TDI Diesel. The BMW features an inline six-cylinder turbocharged 3.0-litre engine that delivers a smooth and quiet ride that can cause one overlook the vehicle's a diesel, individuals Audi has lag-free power delivery that nicely complements its imperturbable feel Having both cars powered by diesel engines and utilizing the 4-door sedan body style within the same 'Luxury car' segment, the only major difference here really is their wheel drive configuration (rear for the BMW and 4 x 4 in the case of the Audi). The first one has a BMW-engineered powertrain under the hood, a 6-cylinder, 24-valves 258hp unit The issue of the low engine speed isn't. The issue is power under the curve. There, in acceleration to 100km, BMW rates it even with the 535i. To 1000m, when aero losses soak up HP and the time below the peak power range after launch is less important, the 535i is bit faster. Diesel (for economy) Fits the family New ish full of toys fun to drive I have narrowed it down to an Audi A8 4.2 Tdi (2010 or 2011) or a BMW 535d (late 2011 or 2012). Both are similar cost to purchase. Audi has slightly higher running costs (but my bro works for Audi so that will help) and (I think) has a better cabin and toys. But it's big. The BMW 535d and the Mercedes-Benz E250 BlueTec are new models for 2014, whereas the Audi A6 TDI has been around for a few years. Here’s how the comparison played out: First place: BMW 535d Vay Tiền Trả Góp Theo Tháng Chỉ Cần Cmnd. jactom90 Posty: 5Dołączył(a): 2014-10-25, 19:55 BMW e60 530d vs AUDI A6 C6 tdi Witam serdecznie, prosze o pomoc w podjeciu decyzji dotyczacej zakupu jednego z aut wymienionych w tytule. Na wstepie zaznacze ze obecjie jestem w posiadaniu obu tych aut, sciagnalem je osobiscie z holandii z zamiarem sprzedazy lecz jednon z nich chcialbym zostawic dla siebie, audi z 2004 a bmw z 2003, pierwsza rej 2004, interesuje mnie najbardziej za i przeciw apropo silnikow tych aut. Bede bardzo wdzieczny za wszelkie sugestie i spostrzezenia. Pozdrawiam marwol Posty: 184Dołączył(a): 2014-03-23, 20:12 Re: BMW e60 530d vs AUDI A6 C6 tdi przez marwol » 2014-10-25, 20:11 Rzuć monetą jactom90 Posty: 5Dołączył(a): 2014-10-25, 19:55 Re: BMW e60 530d vs AUDI A6 C6 tdi przez jactom90 » 2014-10-25, 20:15 To naprawde trudna decyzja, przynajmniej dla mnie oba auta sa bardzo dobrze wyposazone interesuje mnie najbardziej silnik. Dodam ze audi na 265000 a bmw 320000. celi56 Posty: 309Dołączył(a): 2009-05-14, 22:28Lokalizacja: NML Moje BMW: X5 E70 - sprzedaneobecnie 535d E60 :-) Re: BMW e60 530d vs AUDI A6 C6 tdi przez celi56 » 2014-10-25, 20:18 Audi ma drogi rozrząd, jak auto jest w kombi to Audi jak sedan to BMW. jactom90 Posty: 5Dołączył(a): 2014-10-25, 19:55 Re: BMW e60 530d vs AUDI A6 C6 tdi przez jactom90 » 2014-10-25, 20:20 Oba sa w sedanie Powrót do strony głównej Kto przegląda forum Użytkownicy przeglądający ten dział: Brak zidentyfikowanych użytkowników i 0 gości July 25, 2014 BMW 5 Series, BMW Models, BMW News, Reviews LA Times goes on a quest to find the best midsized premium sedan powered by a diesel engine. They pit the BMW 535d against the Audi A6 and Mercedes-Benz E250BlueTec, and the BMW wins! The diesel vehicle produces 255 horsepower and a remarkable 413 lb-ft of torque. It comes paired only with an eight-speed automatic transmission, and 0 to 60 mph comes in just seconds. Here is an excerpt of the review result:First Place: BMW 535dThe best part of this BMW is the engine, one it shares with the X5 SUV and a 7-Series sedan. A turbocharged, inline six-cylinder engine pumps out 255 horsepower and 413 pound-feet of torque. It’s bolted to an eight-speed automatic transmission that routs the power to the car’s rear wheels. lRelated Passion and love drive Jay Leno to fill a 130-car garageEverything about this drivetrain is silky smooth. There’s no rough idle or vibration during acceleration, and the car has more than enough power to validate BMW’s performance its run from zero to 60 mph is second slower than that of the Audi, it’s a more engaging experience and feels faster than those numbers Environmental Protection Agency rates the BMW 535d’s efficiency at 26 miles per gallon in city driving and 38 mpg on the highway, making the car 25% less thirsty than its gas-powered twin. After 350 miles of testing, in more city driving than highway, we averaged 28 full review on LA Times Compare two cars 2010. - 2013. E - Luxury car sedan, 4 door rear Badges Production Vehicle class Body style Wheel drive Safety 2011. - 2014. E - Luxury car sedan, 4 door 4 x 4 Dimensons & Outlines Length Width Height Boot (min) Boot (max) Fuel tank 2010 BMW 5 Series 2011 Audi A6 © GAMA1 Solutions. Copying & distribution prohibited. Engine Petrol 6 - Inline, 4 valves per cylinder Bi-Turbo Engine Fuel Configuration Aspiration Displacement Power Torque Petrol 6 - V config, 4 valves per cylinder Turbo Performance (manual gearbox) Gearbox type Vehicle weight Acc. 0-100 Top speed Cons. (urban) Cons. (highway) Cons. (average) CO2 emissions Performance (automatic gearbox) Gearbox type Vehicle weight Acc. 0-100 Top speed Cons. (urban) Cons. (highway) Cons. (average) CO2 emissions Expenses Virtual Adviser's™ opinion Overview Two significantly similar cars, no doubt about that. Still, each one has something different to offer. Having both cars powered by petrol engines and utilizing the 4-door sedan body style within the same 'Luxury car' segment, the only major difference here really is their wheel drive configuration (rear for the BMW and 4 x 4 in the case of the Audi). The first one has a BMW-engineered powertrain under the hood, a 6-cylinder, 24-valves 306hp unit, while the other one gets its power and torque from a 6-cylinder, 24-valves 310hp engine designed by Volkswagen. Safety Both vehicles got tested by European New Car Assessment Programme (Euro NCAP), with the same number of safety stars gained in the process. Moving further on, let's take a closer look at some additional safety-related facts. Both vehicles belong to the luxury car segment, which is generally a very good thing safety-wise, still it doesn't help us solve our dilemma, does it? On the other hand, when it comes to weight, a factor that most people underestimate, Audi A6 offers a marginal difference of 3% more metal. Reliability Manufacturers have been building their reliability reputation for decades now and, generally speaking, it appears that both brands display similar results in faults and breakdowns, when all the models are taken into account. These are the results of an independent reasearch, while our visitors describe reliability of BMW with an average rating of and models under the Audi badge with out of 5. The same official information place 5 Series as average reliability-wise, and A6 is more or less at the same apart, owners of different cars powered by the same engine as 5 Series rank it on average as while the one under the competitor's bonnet gets out of 5. Performance & Fuel economy Audi is a bit more agile, reaching 100km/h in seconds less than its competitor. In addition to that it accelerates all the way to 250 kilometers per hour, exactly the same as the other car does. When it comes to fuel economy things look pretty much the same for both cars, averaging around liters of fuel per 100 kilometers (34 mpg), in combined cycle. Verdict BMW appears just a bit more reliable, although the difference is truly marginal. The most important thing when deciding between any two vehicles should always be safety, both passive and active. In my opinion, everything taken into account, Audi A6 offers slightly better overall protection and takes the lead. It all continues in the same direction, with Audi offering somewhat better performance, just enough to call it quicker. To make things even better, it consumps less fuel! I believe that, when we take all into account, we have only one winner here - the Audi. Anyway, that's the most objective conclusion I could've came up with and it's based solely on the information found on this website. Aspects such as design, practicality, brand value and driving experience are there for you to measure them out. I suggest you spend two more minutes in order to find out which car, based on your needs and budget, would be picked by the virtual adviser™, among more than different ones in our database. Check a car by its VIN number Compare two cars 2007. - 2010. E - Luxury car sedan, 4 door rear Badges Production Vehicle class Body style Wheel drive Safety 2008. - 2011. E - Luxury car sedan, 4 door 4 x 4 Dimensons & Outlines Length Width Height Boot (min) Boot (max) Fuel tank 2007 BMW 5 Series 2008 Audi A6 © GAMA1 Solutions. Copying & distribution prohibited. Engine Diesel 6 - Inline, 4 valves per cylinder Turbo Engine Fuel Configuration Aspiration Displacement Power Torque Diesel 6 - V config, 4 valves per cylinder Turbo Performance (manual gearbox) Gearbox type Vehicle weight Acc. 0-100 Top speed Cons. (urban) Cons. (highway) Cons. (average) CO2 emissions Performance (automatic gearbox) Gearbox type Vehicle weight Acc. 0-100 Top speed Cons. (urban) Cons. (highway) Cons. (average) CO2 emissions Expenses Virtual Adviser's™ opinion Overview Two significantly similar cars, no doubt about that. Still, each one has something different to offer. Having both cars powered by diesel engines and utilizing the 4-door sedan body style within the same 'Luxury car' segment, the only major difference here really is their wheel drive configuration (rear for the BMW and 4 x 4 in the case of the Audi). The first one has a BMW-engineered powertrain under the hood, a 6-cylinder, 24-valves 235hp unit, while the other one gets its power and torque from a 6-cylinder, 24-valves 240hp engine designed by Audi. Safety A starting point here would be to take a look at the results from European New Car Assessment Programme (Euro NCAP) tests which were performed on both of the cars, with the Audi being a slightly better choice apparently. Still, apart from the official crash test results there are other things we need to be aware of. Both vehicles belong to the luxury car segment, which is generally a very good thing safety-wise, but it doesn't do much to help us decide between the two. On the other hand, when it comes to weight, a factor that most people underestimate, Audi A6 offers a considerable difference of 13% more metal. Reliability Manufacturers have been building their reliability reputation for decades now and, generally speaking, it appears that both brands display similar results in faults and breakdowns, all the models observed together. These are the results of an independent reasearch, while our visitors describe reliability of BMW with an average rating of and models under the Audi badge with out of 5. The same official information place 5 Series as average reliability-wise, and A6 is more or less at the same apart, owners of different cars powered by the same engine as 5 Series rank it on average as out of 5, exactly the same as the other one. Performance & Fuel economy Audi is a bit more agile, reaching 100km/h in seconds less than its competitor. In addition to that it accelerates all the way to 250 kilometers per hour, exactly the same as the other car does. When it comes to fuel economy things look pretty much the same for both cars, averaging around liters of fuel per 100 kilometers (43 mpg), in combined cycle. Verdict Audi appears just a bit more reliable, although the difference is truly marginal. The most important thing when deciding between any two vehicles should always be safety, both passive and active. In my opinion, everything taken into account, Audi A6 beats the other contender by far, making it the best choice without even considering other things. It all continues in the same direction, with Audi offering somewhat better performance, just enough to call it quicker. It does come at a cost though, and that's the fuel consumption... I believe that, when we take all into account, we have only one winner here - the Audi. In any case that's my personal view, built upon all the data available to me. What should decide here though is the way you feel about the two vehicles, and I hope you'll find my guidelines useful in the process. In case you have two minutes to spare I invite you to define your needs, desires and budget and see which car would be chosen by the virtual adviser™, among thousands of similar, yet so different vehicles. Check a car by its VIN number Cars Compare 2016 BMW 535d Overview Details Exterior Interior MSRP Veh 1 $57,350 Veh 2 $59,500 Veh 3 $20,995 MPG (city/hwy) Veh 1 26 / 38 Veh 2 25 / 38 Veh 3 42 / 33 Horse Power Veh 1 255 @ RPM Veh 2 240 @ RPM Veh 3 162 @ RPM Acceleration (0-60) Veh 1 Sec Veh 2 Sec Veh 3 N/A Engine Veh 1 I-6 Veh 2 V-6 Veh 3 I-4 Transmission Veh 1 8-spd w/OD Veh 2 8-spd auto w/OD Veh 3 2-spd CVT w/OD Seating Capacity Veh 1 5 Seats Veh 2 5 Seats Veh 3 5 Seats Cargo Space Veh 1 CF Veh 2 CF Veh 3 N/A Monthly Payment Veh 1 $1,082 Veh 2 $1,123 Veh 3 $396 Cost To Own Veh 1 $64,280 Veh 2 $67,354 Veh 3 $30,299 Data provided by Popular Comparisons $10,000-$15,000 $15,000-$20,000 $20,000-$25,000 $25,000-$30,000 $30,000-$35,000 $35,000-$40,000 $40,000-$45,000 $45,000-$50,000 $50,000-$60,000 $60,000-$70,000 $70,000+

bmw 535d vs audi a6 3.0 tdi